What They Have in Common
Both are 6x rangefinders with slope mode, a slope-switch toggle for tournament play, and ±1 yard accuracy on standard shots. They're priced within $20 of each other, both rated for rain, and both aimed at the same golfer: someone who wants a capable, no-frills laser without spending $350. The baseline is solid on both sides.
Where They Differ
Size and Weight
This is the most immediate difference. The Nikon comes in at 4.6 oz. The Precision Pro NX9 Slope is 10 oz — more than twice the weight. That's not a rounding error. The Nikon fits in a back pocket without a second thought; the NX9 is going in a bag pouch or on a cart mount. If you walk 18 and carry, that weight difference is real over four hours. Nikon also publishes its dimensions (91 × 73 × 37 mm), which tells you it's genuinely compact. Precision Pro doesn't publish theirs, which is a minor annoyance when you're trying to decide if it'll fit your preferred spot.
Range and Accuracy
The NX9 tops out at 900 yards; the Nikon goes to 800. For golf, this is mostly a non-issue — the longest par 5 you're standing at the back of the tee on is probably 620 yards, and you're not ranging the flagstick from there. The Nikon's accuracy is listed as ±1 yard to 100 meters and ±2 yards beyond. The NX9 claims ±1 yard across the board. That's a meaningful distinction on paper, though honestly both are accurate enough that you can't blame the rangefinder when you skull a 9-iron over the green.
Battery
The Nikon runs on a CR2 lithium battery. CR2s are at every pharmacy in the country, which matters — if yours dies during a round, you can fix that problem by the time you make the turn. The Precision Pro NX9 runs a lifetime battery replacement program, which is an interesting answer to a different question. You don't buy batteries; you send it in or contact them when the battery eventually dies. That's convenient in the long run but requires a little faith in the program sticking around. Seems like it works well for Precision Pro customers, but it's a different kind of commitment than keeping a spare CR2 in your bag.
Mounting, Feedback, and Build Features
The NX9 has a magnetic cart mount built in, which is genuinely useful if you ride. Grab and go, every hole. It also has pulse vibration to confirm lock-on, which a lot of golfers prefer over reading a number and second-guessing themselves. The Nikon has its "Locked-On Quake" anti-shake stabilization and a multilayer lens coating — features aimed at optical quality and measurement confidence. Neither one is wrong; they're just solving for different preferences. The Nikon is built around clean optics and a rock-steady read. The NX9 is built around convenience features for cart golfers.
Warranty
Nikon covers the COOLSHOT 20i GIII for five years. Precision Pro gives you two. That's a meaningful gap on a $200 purchase.
Who Should Buy Which
Get the Nikon COOLSHOT 20i GIII if:
- You walk and carry your bag, and weight actually accumulates over 18 holes
- You're the golfer who's had a rangefinder die mid-round and wants to grab a CR2 at the pro shop without drama
- Optics quality and steady reads matter more to you than mounting convenience
- You want five years of warranty coverage and are buying this to last
Get the Precision Pro NX9 Slope if:
- You ride in a cart most rounds and want to slap the rangefinder on the mount, drive to your ball, and not think about it
- You've lost a rangefinder to a dead battery and want to hand that problem to someone else permanently
- You're the 18-handicap who plays weekend rounds with friends and wants pulse confirmation that you actually locked onto the flag
- The $20 savings helps and the feature set feels more aligned with how you actually play
The Bottom Line
Twenty bucks separates these, so this really does come down to how you play. The Nikon COOLSHOT 20i GIII is the better rangefinder if you're walking, want better long-term warranty coverage, and prefer a genuinely pocketable unit with proven optics. The Precision Pro NX9 Slope wins on cart-mount convenience, range ceiling, and the battery program — which is either a great feature or unnecessary friction depending on how you look at it.
I'd go with the Nikon. The weight difference and five-year warranty tip it for me, and I'd rather have a CR2 in my bag than depend on a program.
Get the Nikon COOLSHOT 20i GIII.
See Also